Skip to main content

The Cable Show 2011: Targeted Networks Defend Pricey Programming

Click here for more Cable Show 2011 coverage

Chicago -- Byron Allen of Entertainment Studio Networks hit
a nerve when he said in a Cable Show session Tuesday that cable networks must
significantly reduce their programming costs to stay competitive.

Speaking on the panel "Changing Channels: The Evolution of
Targeted Networks in a Multi-Platform World," Allen, CEO of the independent
producer/distributor, said it's never been a better time for independent
networks to gain traction because of the competition from multi-platform

"If you produce content and you produce it at an efficient
price, there's an audience," he said. He went on to praise Netflix for
providing an array of viewing options at an affordable price while chastising
the cable industry for failing to contain costs that get passed on to subscribers
while predicting viewer migration to cheaper forms of content delivery.

The sentiment didn't sit so well with the rest of the
panelists, all heads of traditional cable networks, with some pointing out that
viewer migration to cable platforms is merely additive to linear viewing.

"People are increasing their consumption of media," said Kim
Martin, president and GM of WE tv and Wedding Central. "It's not like we're
losing them, people are just consuming more."

"You need reach vehicles to make anything have scale," added
Marc Juris, executive VP and GM of tru TV, saying that you have to combine a
larger vehicle like cable TV and the Internet to reach a meaningful number of

Syfy President Dave Howe defended the cable business model
as funding the necessity of expensive programming. "If you cut it beyond a
certain threshold you will damage the business model and the value that you
bring to the consumer."

And while Allen sang the praises of over-the-top for
attracting writers and producers that want more creative freedom than a
traditional network can provide, others argued the disparate nature of the
vehicle can be a barrier to success.

"With YouTube there is no branding, it's just random shows
with no context," said Henry Schleiff, president and GM of Investigation Discovery and Military Channel. "The importance of context that a linear
channel and brand gives to these random shows and series is a very, very
important element of why some succeed."

Attempting to moderate the linear vs. OTT debate, Cooking Channel GM Michael Smith calmed the
mood by saying, "I don't think it's either or," citing how CDs didn't make people
stop listening to radio. "What we have is a more diverse world. I see a world
where everyone's right."