NCTA–The Internet & Television Association and AT&T have teamed up to tell the FCC just what they think of chairman Tom Wheeler's "apps-based" alternative to his initial "unlock the box" set-top proposal, and the review does not have many stars.
They argue that while it is billed as app-based and copyright-respectful, the reality is much different. In a filing with the commission, NCTA and AT&T said the proposal suffers from legal flaws and undermines MVPD service, as did the chairman's original proposal, they say.
While NCTA and AT&T encouraged the FCC to adopt an apps-based alternative, this is clearly not what they had in mind.
In the letter, they said the chairman's proposal would 1) impose "extraordinary limits on how MVPDs can deliver their service," limits not put on the their competitors; 2) "create new barriers to innovation and defeat key attributes of apps" by forcing them to comply with an as-yet-determined standard; 3) prevent new features on set-tops unless they were replicable on all app platforms and require a government sign-off on any variation of an app license; 4) create privacy issues by requiring making data available to third parties that raise unbundling issues as well; 5) make the FCC the arbiter of contract terms; 6) prevent programmers and MVPDs from enforcing copyrights, privacy and more; 7) regulate not only new apps, but ones already in the marketplace, including TV Everywhere services; and 8) impose a "perpetual burden" on MVPDs to build and maintain apps. NCTA's proposed app would also have been free, but NCTA and AT&T say the FCC's app "burden" has no mechanism for MVPDs to even recover the cost, leading to "increased prices for all subscribers."
Wheeler told Congress last week the item is 90% there, and he was willing to tweak it to address concerns—though he said the FCC was not creating a new compulsory license or setting itself up as a copyright overseer—but he still planned a Sept. 29 vote, which would come despite a drumbeat of pushback on the proposal by Hill Democrats and Republicans, unions, programmers, and MVPDs.
NCTA and AT&T signaled they didn't think it was salvageable with mere adjustments.
"The Commission cannot avoid the serious flaws with the Chairman’s new proposal simply by tweaking or removing only parts of it," they said.
One thought was that the FCC could perhaps vote on the basics of the app proposal but separate out the proposed app licensing body and hammer that out down the line.
However, they said that "even if the licensing body requirements are retracted, as they certainly should be, unless the Commission also removes the entitlement data and parity mandates and the other flaws discussed herein, the new proposal cannot be sustained as a matter of law or sound public policy."
Contributing editor John Eggerton has been an editor and/or writer on media regulation, legislation and policy for over four decades, including covering the FCC, FTC, Congress, the major media trade associations, and the federal courts. In addition to Multichannel News and Broadcasting + Cable, his work has appeared in Radio World, TV Technology, TV Fax, This Week in Consumer Electronics, Variety and the Encyclopedia Britannica.
The smarter way to stay on top of broadcasting and cable industry. Sign up below.
Thank you for signing up to Broadcasting & Cable. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.