ECIPE Takes Aim at Title II Treaty Argument

The European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) has taken aim at the suggestion that if the FCC does not impose strong network-neutrality rules, including a ban on paid prioritization, it will run afoul of international commitments.

Hosuk Lee-Makiyama, director of the ECIPE, said the suggestion that the World Trade Organization's Basic Agreement on Telecommunications Services (BATS) requires such rules is off base.

In a December 2014 filing at the FCC back in December, a pair of George Washington University professors argued that FCC chairman Tom Wheeler's original proposal of new Open Internet rules based in Sec. 706 authority and allowing for commercially reasonable discrimination (paid prioritization) would have run afoul of the U.S.'s WTO obligation to "respect principles of nondiscrimination and free expression" and was bound by the BATS agreement, among others.

For the full story go to

John Eggerton

Contributing editor John Eggerton has been an editor and/or writer on media regulation, legislation and policy for over four decades, including covering the FCC, FTC, Congress, the major media trade associations, and the federal courts. In addition to Multichannel News and Broadcasting + Cable, his work has appeared in Radio World, TV Technology, TV Fax, This Week in Consumer Electronics, Variety and the Encyclopedia Britannica.