Comcast has filed suit against the mayor of Nashville as well as the city and head of public works over what the company says was an illegal attempt to move its pole attachments without Comcast's consent.
According to the suit, Comcast says the city also provided "far less" notice than either federal law or its contract with the city allows.
AT&T filed a similar suit last month.
The new ordinance was passed Sept. 20 and subsequently signed by the mayor. The idea is to speed new communications competition—in this case Google Fiber. It makes it easier for new pole users to attach their own equipment. But Comcast says that amounts to unilateral interference with its equipment without its consent and on short notice—15 days in some cases, 30 in others.
Google Fiber has been getting breaks from cities looking to boost competition to incumbent providers.
Comcast also takes issue with the fact that the ordinance does not get to approve the contractors doing the moving of their equipment, so the company does not know whether those contractors meet Comcast standards.
"Indeed, the Ordinance allows these encroaching attachers to do so even in cases in which the make-ready work is reasonably expected to cause service outages for Comcast’s customers—and still without Comcast’s consent, still without approved contractors or approved standards, and with the only caveat being that the encroaching attacher must give Comcast 30 rather than 15 days’ notice," says the suit.
Comcast points out that the FCC has a comprehensive set of rules governing pole "make ready" processes—including at least 60 days notice of "make ready" work and allowing the equipment owner to do that work. It wants the ordinance invalidated as conflicting with federal law and its enforcement permanently enjoined.
The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.
"From day one, we have been committed to working with local stakeholders on a collaborative solution that improves the pace of broadband deployment in Nashville," said Comcast of the suit. "Unfortunately, the City Council has chosen to adopt an ordinance that violates existing FCC rules, creates significant safety concerns and increases the likelihood for service disruptions. We prefer a business-to-business agreement that reduces permitting times, eliminates unnecessary requirements, improves field coordination between parties and speeds up the overall rate of make-ready work. One Touch creates enormous problems for consumers that we cannot let stand, and we have no choice but to pursue legal action that protects our customers and our network."
The television industry's top news stories, analysis and blogs of the day.
Thank you for signing up to Next TV. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.