Comcast: National Nets Should Not Be Part of Arbitration Regime

Comcast would prefer that the FCC not impose outside arbitration conditions on its proposed joint venture with NBCU. If it does, however, the company says it should not apply them to national cable network negotiations.

There is precedent for program access arbitration conditions on regional sports nets (RSNs), and Comcast recognized that in a conversation with John Flynn, FCC senior counsel for transactions, according to an ex parte filing posted Tuesday.

In a Nov. 26 conversation, Kathy Zachem, Comcast VP for Regulatory and State Legislative Affairs, said that "to the extent the Commission considers a program access arbitration remedy for MVPDs, I emphasized that the weight of the economic and factual evidence in the record compels the exclusion of national cable networks from any such condition."

She also argued that substituting arbitration for the FCC complaint process for RSNs was problematic as well.
Zachem said that any program access conditions for online video--which are being pushed by various deal critics--would be "very complicated," and said Comcast should not be prevented from striking online deals post-merger that are "standard throughout the industry."

In its argument to the commission for conditions on the deal, DirecTV argued that national nets should be included in an arbitration regime, saying that they can be just the kind of "marquee" programming that can give a vertically integrated programmer the ability to disadvantage its MVPD competition.

John Eggerton

Contributing editor John Eggerton has been an editor and/or writer on media regulation, legislation and policy for over four decades, including covering the FCC, FTC, Congress, the major media trade associations, and the federal courts. In addition to Multichannel News and Broadcasting + Cable, his work has appeared in Radio World, TV Technology, TV Fax, This Week in Consumer Electronics, Variety and the Encyclopedia Britannica.