Altice USA has told the FCC to disregard Starz petition for injunctive relief. It says the petition was procedurally defective, has no basis in law or fact or policy, and was simply an effort to manipulate the regulatory process for its business ends.
Those ends would be to get its programming back on Altice-owned cable systems. Starz asked the FCC earlier this month to intervene to get its networks back on Altice USA (Optimum) in New York. The company had first filed a petition for declaratory ruling with the FCC, following that up last week with the emergency petition for injunctive relief.
Tyler Perry Chines in on Altice USA/Starz Dispute.
Altice USA says it was an untimely petition because it was an emergency petition filed three weeks after the channels came off Jan. 1. Had it been an emergency, Altice argues, Starz would have filed the emergency petition before that.
Altice also says Starz is engaging in a campaign to mislead customers and "disrupt" Altice call centers.
The cable operator also disputes Starz assertion that it did not give its customers adequate notice of the blackout. "The FCC requires that cable operators provide customers notice of programming changes at least thirty days in advance of the change when the change is within the control of the cable operator," Altice said. "In this case, Altice did not know that an agreement for carriage would not be reached, despite its numerous offers, until December 31, 2017."
Altice says its negotiations with Starz broke down not from any violation of FCC rules but because Starz wanted more than Altice was willing to pay and pass along to its customers.
Starz wants Altice USA to "restore carriage of Starz, StarzEncore and Movieplex for the FCC-required 30-day notice period; correct Altice’s misleading and false disclosures regarding its deletions of Starz’s channels; and respond to consumer inquiries and complaints in compliance with FCC rules."
Altice says Starz has not come close to meeting the threshold for an emergency stay, which is a showing of irreparable harm absent a stay (Altice says several million subs losing access to Starz is not such harm(, the likelihood of success on the case's merits, that Altice would not be harmed by the stay, or that the public interest favors the requested stay.
The smarter way to stay on top of broadcasting and cable industry. Sign up below.
Thank you for signing up to Broadcasting & Cable. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.