The cable-telco legal melee of the week: Comcast claimsAT&T’s U-Verse services have caused “significant damage” to its coaxial cable network in the Chicago area — while the telephone company is seeking to block the cabler's ads that poke fun at the large outdoor boxes used to deliver U-verse TV.
AT&T fired the first legal salvo, a false-advertising suit on March 21 against Comcast in federal court in Chicago. The telco asserted that a Comcast ad campaign falsely states AT&T will install “giant utility boxes” on customers' properties. AT&T says the boxes — called video-ready access devices (VRADs) — only occasionally are placed on private property, with the consent of the owner.
“Purchasing AT&T television service offerings does not result in a VRAD being placed in a customer's yard,” AT&T said.
Comcast struck back. A countersuit on April 20 claimed shoddy AT&T installs resulted in damaging interference with Comcast's cable infrastructure and left hundreds of customers without phone, Internet and TV service.
Comcast complained that improper AT&T U-verse installations caused network disruptions at least 40 times since February. The problems occur, Comcast said, when customers have both U-verse and Comcast services. In certain cases, feedback from U-verse equipment has caused outages of entire Comcast nodes, which have affected more than 17,000 Chicago-area subscribers.
“AT&T has been aware of this problem for more than a year and yet they have failed to fix the issue,” Comcast director of corporate communications Charlie Douglas said in a statement.
Responded AT&T spokeswoman Jenny Parker, “We think Comcast's suit lacks merit and will vigorously fight it as the case continues.”
Sadly, though, the 5-foot-3-inch-tall, 35-cubic-feet VRADs probably are too big to appear in court.
The smarter way to stay on top of the multichannel video marketplace. Sign up below.
Thank you for signing up to Multichannel News. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.