The National Association of Broadcasters is asking the FCC to convene a meeting between broadcasters and tech companies over how to open up the 6 Ghz band for unlicensed wireless broadband use by local radio area local network (RLAN) devices.
Companies like Broadcom, Microsoft, Facebook, Google and Qualcomm argue that the FCC can allow RLANS to operate at power levels compatible with incumbent broadcast uses, levels that NAB counters could interfere with electronic newsgathering.
NAB said it is willing to share the band at suitable power levels, but not at the power levels the computer companies and WiFi companies are proposing. It had a new argument for protecting ENG. "[T]he Commission need look no further than the heroic work of our nation’s broadcasters during the current pandemic to understand the incredible value of 6 GHz to not only broadcasters, but to the country as a whole."
"[T]he unlicensed uses under consideration in this proceeding are simply incompatible with mobile broadcast operations used for ENG – and no proposal advanced by any party to date will protect those mobile operations," NAB said.
In phone conferences with aids to FCC staffers, NAB said it should convene and moderate a discussion between the "RLAN group and NAB" to discuss the issue of potential harmful interference. "This discussion should be moderated by the Office of Engineering and Technology, with the Wireless and Media advisors for the commissioners free to attend and ask questions," said NAB.
The computer companies argue that setting the power levels too low could render the devices unreliable, with dropped connections, limits on the types of apps they could support, and limited battery capacity.
Rather than adopt the lower power levels broadcasters seek, the computer companies want the FCC to issue a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) proposing the higher power and seeking comment.
The television industry's top news stories, analysis and blogs of the day.
Thank you for signing up to Broadcasting & Cable. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.