Senate Dems Push for FCC Answers on Court's Net Neutrality Remand Questions
More than two dozen senators, all Democrats, are citing the coronavirus in calling on the FCC to reevaluate the decision to deregulate internet access in the Restoring Internet Freedom (RIF) order.
Led by net neutrality rule fan Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and including presidential candidate Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former candidates Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar, the group wrote FCC chairman Ajit Pai Wednesday (April 1) saying it needed to think hard about a federal court's directive that the FCC had not sufficiently explained how its December 2017 deregulation decision would affect public safety, its Lifeline low-income broadband subsidy and access to utility poles for network deployment.
Related: FCC Net Neutrality Docket Heats Up Again
The senators argue that in the RIF order, the FCC "abandoned" its ability to "promote public safety, universal service, and broadband competition," particularly for the low-income and rural residents. Those are the ones now being hardest hit by lack of broadband in a sheltering-in-place world getting its work and schoolwork and health monitoring done remotely.
"[T]he Court also explicitly instructed the FCC to seek comment on how the repeal impacted public safety, the Lifeline program, and pole attachments. The agency must follow the Court’s guidance thoroughly and fairly," they wrote.
The senators did not invoke the pandemic directly, but suggested access to broadband was more important now than ever. They did close by noting that the letter had no physical signatures due to the closure of Senate offices during the pandemic.
The FCC has sought comment on the court remand, resulting in what is currently the busiest docket at the FCC, with 7,849 comments in the past 30 days (number two on the top 10 list of busiest dockets only has 387).
Multichannel Newsletter
The smarter way to stay on top of the multichannel video marketplace. Sign up below.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the bulk of the agency's decision to reclassify ISPs as Title I information service providers that aren’t subject to Title II common-carrier regulations and to eliminate the rules against blocking, throttling, paid prioritization, and a general conduct rule. But the court said the FCC needed to better explain the impact of those decisions on public safety, the regulation of pole attachments, and its Lifeline broadband/phone subsidy program.
Also signing on to the Hill letter were Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Ben Cardin (D-M.D.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Chris Van Hollen (D-M.D.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), and Tom Carper (D-Del.).
Contributing editor John Eggerton has been an editor and/or writer on media regulation, legislation and policy for over four decades, including covering the FCC, FTC, Congress, the major media trade associations, and the federal courts. In addition to Multichannel News and Broadcasting + Cable, his work has appeared in Radio World, TV Technology, TV Fax, This Week in Consumer Electronics, Variety and the Encyclopedia Britannica.