A federal district judge in Washington Wednesday (April 1) ruled that the Department of Justice's settlement of its challenge to the T-Mobile-Sprint merger was in the public interest, paving the way for the closing of the deal.
Justice and a number of states--Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Texas--had agreed to the settlement with the companies and Dish.
Part of the settlement was that the combined company had to spin off its prepaid businesses, including Boost Mobile, Virgin Mobile, and Sprint prepaid brands, to Dish, as well as spectrum assets.
The idea was to seed Dish as a new, eventually facilities-based, wireless competitor given that the deal was reducing the Big Four--AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile--to the Big Three.
"I am pleased that the court has entered the final judgment, and I appreciate all of the work from Judge Kelly and the district court staff, particularly in the midst of the current COVID-19 disruption,” said Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, who heads DOJ's Antitrust Division. “The T-Mobile-Sprint transaction, as remedied by the Department of Justice, will combine T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s complementary spectrum assets while preserving competition. Our settlement promises to expand output further by bringing Dish’s extensive spectrum holdings to the market. The end result will be strengthened competition with high-quality 5G networks that will benefit American consumers nationwide.”
A New York Southern District Judge had denied a request by another group of states, led by New York and California, to block the deal, in part because of the DOJ deal remedies. The FCC also approved the deal.
Weekly digest of streaming and OTT industry news
Thank you for signing up to Multichannel News. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.