Whether cable operators should offer a la carte programming to consumers goes before a House subcommittee July 14, continuing Capitol Hill’s interest in an issue that caught the cable industry by surprise.
The House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet is holding the hearing. A witness list was not available, but MSO and programming executives are expected to appear.
The hearing is a compromise reached early in the year that killed an a la carte effort pushed by Rep. Nathan Deal (R-Ga.). He proposed an amendment that would have prevented cable programmers from banning pay TV distributors from offering their services a la carte.
Deal dropped his amendment -- which he wanted to add to the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act -- in exchange for a hearing and a Federal Communications Commission study. The House Energy and Commerce Committee has set a Nov. 18 deadline for completion of the FCC report.
Big players in the cable industry oppose mandated a la carte, while small-operator members of the American Cable Association do not. Some on Capitol Hill view a la carte as means of lowering cable rates and filtering indecent programming.
The National Cable & Telecommunications Association insists that forced a la carte would mean that consumers would pay more for a small programming lineup. The trade group has said that a General Accounting Office study in October 2003 supports its conclusions.
The smarter way to stay on top of the multichannel video marketplace. Sign up below.
Thank you for signing up to Multichannel News. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.