Edge players have launched the latest legal salvo in their attempt to block a Florida law they say unconstitutionally restricts free speech, equal protection and due process.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association and NetChoice, which together represent all the big players--Amazon, Google, Twitter, Mozilla (Dish and Verizon as well), have filed for a preliminary injunction in a Tallahassee federal district court asking it to block enforcement of the state law scheduled to go into effect next month.
The law takes effect July 1, and the groups want the court to decide on the injunction ASAP and say that without that injunction, "the Act will throw into legal jeopardy countless moderation measures taken by these businesses on a continual basis, will flatly bar them from removing or regulating large swaths of online content that might be highly objectionable or in violation of their rules, and require them to send millions of new, detailed notices to their users."
The two association's filed suit late last month over a recently passed law that limits websites' Sec. 230 immunity from civil liability over their moderation third party content
The law was passed by the Republican-controlled legislature.
Republicans have argued that Silicon Valley giants have attempted to suppress conservative speech in the guise of moderating their platforms and under the protection of Sec. 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which exempts them with civil liability over most of that third party content.
The bill's language makes that clear, saying: "Social media platforms have unfairly censored, shadow banned, de-platformed, and applied post-prioritization algorithms to Floridians." The bill presumes that doing so is not acting in bad faith, which means it is legally actionable, and the governor signaled the state's attorney general would act if that were the case.
CCIA and NetChoice, in the suit filed May 27, said the law would open platforms to suits for content moderation policies designed to protect users' safety. They argue, among other things, that edge providers have a First Amendment right to protect users including by determining "what material is appropriate for their community."
“By binding the hands of digital services fighting dangerous content online, this law would give free rein to bad actors ranging from anti-American extremists to online predators," said CCIA President Matt Schruers. "At the same time, when a digital service decides that Nazi political candidates are unwelcome on its platform, it is exercising its free speech rights, and this law violates that Constitutional protection. That is why we filed this motion..."
The smarter way to stay on top of the multichannel video marketplace. Sign up below.
Thank you for signing up to Multichannel News. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.