AT&T: No Need for FCC Set-Top Waiver
AT&T didn’t seek a set-top-box waiver from the Federal Communications Commission because the company claimed that its Internet-protocol video-delivery technology isn’t covered by the law that forced traditional cable operators to discontinue deployment of integrated set-top boxes July 1.
AT&T spokesman Mike Balmoris said that because the company’s U-verse TV pay TV service didn’t use cable set-tops that contained both channel surfing and signal security features, it didn’t need a waiver.
“The intelligence that this ban is seeking to separate doesn’t reside in our set-top box. It’s in our network,” Balmoris said. “We beam one channel at a time into your home, like when you download a Web page.”
On July 1, the FCC barred cable companies without legal waivers from issuing integrated set-top boxes. Going forward, they need to deploy boxes that rely on CableCARDs as their anti-signal-theft technology.
The FCC granted dozens of waivers June 29, especially to providers that promised to be all-digital by Feb. 17, 2009. Verizon Communications received a waiver for low-end, two-way boxes until Dec. 31, 2009, and for high-end HD/digital-video-recorder boxes until July 1, 2008.
The FCC said the high-end waiver was necessary because CableCARD-enabled boxes haven’t been made for video operators that rely on IP technology.
Since AT&T U-verse is an IP-based system, it also was covered by the FCC’s June 29 order, Balmoris added.
Multichannel Newsletter
The smarter way to stay on top of the multichannel video marketplace. Sign up below.
“It’s not just AT&T U-verse: It’s all IP video, which includes, of course, AT&T. We are not the only IP [provider],” Balmoris said.
FCC spokeswoman Mary Diamond said the FCC didn’t issue AT&T a waiver. “You need to request a waiver to be granted a waiver,” she added.