Say you just paid for a burger that tasted like a dirty sneaker. The bun was moldy. The tomato was a greenish-white. And there was a hair on it. Would you go back to the joint that had the nerve to serve it to you?
Akamai Technologies is touting a survey, which it paid for, of 2,319 online consumers that showed 60% of people who watch online video at least once per week are less likely to return to a site for video content if the viewing experience is "poor."
My first reaction: Uh-huh. They needed to pay for a survey to figure that out?
My second reaction was: Wait a second–what about the 40% of those surveyed who weren’t disuaded by the "poor" experience? Are they gluttons for punishment? Are they unemployed and happen to watch a lot of YouTube videos? Or do they simply have low expectations?
I got on the phone with Akamai senior product marketing manager Suzanne Johnson, who explained that in some cases, online video is available exclusively through a single site. "So people are going to struggle through it because they can’t get it anywhere else," she said.
But, she insisted, a 60% audience drop-off is huge–the point being, lest you miss it, that Akamai’s content-delivery network is supposed to minimize the chance you’ll disappoint Internet-video viewers.
To me, this survey more directly reveals that a lot people think Internet video is supposed to suck.
And the results also underscore that a TV is the preferred device for video: 42% of those surveyed said they didn’t watch more online video because "I prefer to watch programs on TV"–the No. 1 response, followed by 29% who said they lack the time and 27% whose Internet connections were too slow.
The smarter way to stay on top of the multichannel video marketplace. Sign up below.
Thank you for signing up to Multichannel News. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.