After the critical adulation, the 16 Emmy nominations, the magazine covers and the Brandweek-reported $25 million promotional spend by AMC, viewers had the chance to vote on returning dramatic series Mad Men with their remotes last Sunday (July 27) at 10 p.m.
The result: a victory, but perhaps a qualified one.
As AMC pointed out in a press release, the initial Nielsen Media Research count showed 1.9 million viewers tuned in to see the first episode of the Matt Weiner-created drama's second season. AMC touted that as double the first season's average rating — but Mad Men tailed off in the first year after starting out with 1.6 million viewers for the premiere. That meant the season-two kickoff was about 19% ahead of the first season's premiere.
When the “live-plus-same-day” numbers came out that included an extra day's recorded viewings, the number rose above 2 million. That brings the impact of all the paid and free promotion — and critical buzz — up to a 25% lift for the premiere episode of a series that declined in average viewing in the first season.
The viewing number is likely to rise, though, when the “live-plus-seven-day” numbers are released, if the first season's viewing of the glossy, 1960s era series is a guide. Turner Research's analysis of summer 2007 shows indicated about one third of Mad Men viewers in the coveted ages-18-to-49 demographic recorded it.
AMC said the Mad Men season-two debut nearly doubled its 18-to-49 viewers (955,000 versus 510,000) in the overnight count when compared to the season-one premiere. It also enjoyed a nice comparative rise in 25-to-54s: 996,000 vs. 731,000.
Also, some viewers are worth more than others, and Mediabuyerplanner reported a third of Mad Men's targeted 25-to-54s earn $100,000 or more to spend, able to role-play as Sterling Cooperites with Jack Daniels and Gucci loafers.
The smarter way to stay on top of the multichannel video marketplace. Sign up below.
Thank you for signing up to Multichannel News. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.