<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:cf="https://www.futureplc.com/rss/content-flags"
>
    <channel>
                    <atom:link href="https://www.nexttv.com/feeds/tag/subscriber-retention" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                            <title><![CDATA[ Latest from Next TV in Subscriber-retention ]]></title>
                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/tag/subscriber-retention</link>
        <description><![CDATA[ All the latest subscriber-retention content from the Next TV team ]]></description>
                                    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 11:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                            <language>en</language>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ The New Analytics Needed for Attracting Cord-Cutters ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/blog/new-analytics-needed-attracting-cord-cutters</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ The New Analytics Needed for Attracting Cord-Cutters ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">2r9YHnhwFwoQLRjGG3jSXC</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/neSo5x76NGEKSovu3JmSeP-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[MCN Guest Blog]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Kate Mitchell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                        <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/neSo5x76NGEKSovu3JmSeP-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/neSo5x76NGEKSovu3JmSeP-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>"Deep Packet Inspection can play a key role within cable operator networks; e.g., for traffic engineering and network security. But it presents significant shortcomings in holistically analyzing subscriber activity, which is key for both retention and growth." <em>—Kate Mitchell, Edge Intelligence</em></p><p>Cable providers are at a critical juncture.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="yFa2YLZu8Jg4NRSfXdLc5W" name="" alt="Kate Mitchell" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yFa2YLZu8Jg4NRSfXdLc5W.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/yFa2YLZu8Jg4NRSfXdLc5W.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div><figcaption itemprop="caption description" class="pull-"><span class="caption-text">Kate Mitchell </span></figcaption></figure><p>The number of consumers abandoning TV subscriptions for over-the-top offerings continues to grow. At the end of Q1, 3.4% of households cut the cord over the prior year, the highest rate ever, leaving about 83 million households paying for cable services in the U.S. This doesn’t include the increasing numbers among new households and younger demographics that have never subscribed to a pay TV service in the first place, a.k.a., “cord-nevers.”</p><p>Currently, approximately 13.5 million households (14% of all households) don’t pay for traditional forms of TV service. By 2021, eMarketer predicts, the number of cord-cutters will nearly equal the people who never had pay TV — a total of 81 million U.S. adults.</p><p>While this may all seem like doom and gloom for cable MSOs, it’s actually an opportunity to stop the cord-cutting trend and also win over cord-nevers through innovation. For cable operators to quickly turn the tide, it will require a stronger understanding of their subscriber base, or deeper than what’s possible with Deep Packet Inspection (DPI).</p><p><strong>Seeing the Limits of the Old</strong></p><p>DPI has been the default method over the past decade for examining and managing network traffic; it runs in line with production traffic or sends copies of packets to a network monitoring connection to inspect packets flowing through the network. Data is extracted from within each packet.</p><p>DPI can play a key role within cable operator networks; e.g., for traffic engineering and network security. But it presents significant shortcomings in holistically analyzing subscriber activity, which is key for both retention and growth.</p><p>What are those obstacles? First, it’s very challenging and costly to scale a DPI offering since it relies on inspecting at the packet level, on every port, at increasingly high network speeds. In addition, it can be difficult and immensely time-consuming and labor-intensive to gain customer insight from DPI systems since the hardware can be siloed and spread across many locations deep inside the network.</p><p>So how can cable MSOs obtain the subscriber insight they need to positively impact their business?</p><p><strong>New Analytical Architectures</strong></p><p>Big data analytics — the process of examining large and diverse data sets — can enable MSOs to discover hidden patterns, previously unknown correlations, customer preferences and other highly useful information to help them make more informed business decisions. And network data for cable operators is big, with hundreds of billions of records added daily, generated from millions of subscribers, and the need to retain trillions of records for analysis and compliance purposes. </p><p>So the collection, real-time correlation, analysis and retention requirements placed on the analytical architecture are demanding — and many big data architectures are unable to keep pace. Analytics should provide the granular insight into and throughout the entire customer lifecycle that cable providers need to effectively support things such as usage-based billing, support-related inquires, proactive upgrades to bigger plans and anticipating those likely to churn. That knowledge can help inform activities directly geared to current and prospective subscribers.</p><p>For example, with the knowledge of subscriber behaviors garnered from big data analytics, cable providers can grow revenues through initiatives such as targeted promotions and customized product offerings. For those predicted to churn, better customer service and incentive offers may help in maintaining their business.</p><p>And for consumers who no longer subscribe to cable services but do still have data plans, providers can use big data analytics to determine their OTT viewing, web content and download data so they can figure out how best to monetize this use of their network. With this deep level of knowledge, cable providers can have accurate insight on data consumption to make sure usage-based billing and capped data tiers can capture revenue to offset what they’re losing from paid TV.</p><p><strong>Going Deeper</strong></p><p>While DPI still has an important role in supporting cable MSOs, it’s not cutting it in this time of cord-cutting. What’s needed is a way to understand subscribers on a deeper level than DPI can provide. By being able to better analyze the immense amount of data that’s available, cable providers can be well positioned to provide customers with personalized offers that resonate, incentives that motivate and service that delights — helping providers to retain and grow their business.</p><p><em>Kate Mitchell is CEO of Edge Intelligence, a distributed analytics platform.</em></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ The End-Goal of Cable Innovation: A Clear Focus on Retention ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/blog/end-goal-cable-innovation-clear-focus-retention-417334</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ The End-Goal of Cable Innovation: A Clear Focus on Retention ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">JvUPaeCZ5zCoQy75MBH6N</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eqdzzjgAzHfVmsRvB9qaYZ-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[MCN Guest Blog]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Paul Hughes, Netcracker Technology ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                        <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eqdzzjgAzHfVmsRvB9qaYZ-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eqdzzjgAzHfVmsRvB9qaYZ-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>If you’re a cable subscriber, you’ve been a participant in the slow but steady transformation of a complex and multifaceted industry. While most consumers may think that turning on the television to watch CNN or stream Netflix is a simple process, making these processes work seamlessly has been years in the making.<br/><br/>The television was once the central component of our home entertainment experience; now, it could be a wireless phone or tablet, laptop or other screen-based device. Consumers with 4G/LTE-connected devices can get HD-quality pictures without the need for WiFi, and the wireless providers have created packages to lure them to do exactly that. Competition has cost the cable industry a large portion of younger audiences, who now use Apple TV, Google Chromecast, Roku or their wireless devices to stream online services such as Hulu, Netflix and Amazon. These new options create business headaches for the cable companies, who must either coexist, cohabitate or partner with these content providers.<br/><br/><a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/millennials-more-likely-stream-less-likely-avoid-ads-411265" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/millennials-more-likely-stream-less-likely-avoid-ads-411265">Related: Millennials More Likely to Stream, Less Likely to Avoid Ads</a><br/><br/>What does this mean for cable MSOs? It means a forced hand to innovate, and likely faster than they’ve been used to. Over the past five years, we have seen investments in fiber, expansion into wireless services, higher broadband speeds and a broader service portfolio. This is all happening in areas where many U.S. consumers only have a single cable provider or ISP they can subscribe to.<br/><br/>However, the competitive threats from outside have also been a driving factor in forcing these changes. Together, these influences have driven providers to look further than the service-centric portfolio, into operational efficiency, customer support, workforce management and in a generic sense, greater levels of automation — and all done without causing any disruption to services.<br/><br/><a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/global-ott-video-viewing-doubles-conviva-417305" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/global-ott-video-viewing-doubles-conviva-417305">Related: Global OTT Video Viewing Doubles, Conviva Finds</a><br/><br/>The cable and broadband industry’s focus of all this innovation must been centered on one key outcome — customer retention. The reasoning is simple: Regardless of what may be a broadband monopoly in certain markets, consumers are still cutting the cord. Research firm eMarketer states that in 2017, a total of 22.2 million U.S. adults will have cut the cord on cable, satellite or telco TV services. That is up 33% from 16.7 million in 2016. Enterprise customers are a growing portion of the total base but remain a small fraction of the overall business today. These numbers paint a somewhat dire long-term picture for the industry. That makes the customer experience one of the most, if not the most critical factor that companies must embrace, and the cable industry must take note.<br/><br/><strong>Investing in the Customer Experience</strong><br/>Cable providers should be investing in innovation around the customer experience in both tactical and strategic ways. While some of these innovations may not be customer-focused, all are business-focused, which in turn has a direct impact on customer satisfaction, retention and churn reduction. Following are some of the more effective methods that can have a positive impact on the customer relationship.<br/><br/><strong>Intelligent Use of Net Promoter Scores For Both Organization and Employee:</strong> Investment in the right tools to gathering data at every step of the customer lifecycle is one of the best real-time methods to gain access to customer expectations and sentiment. Cable providers should be gathering NPS regarding home installs, follow-ups to calls or visits designed to speed problem resolutions, and all activities concerning issue resolution.<br/><br/><strong>Greater Use of AI and Analytics For Network Performance Management:</strong> The use of a broad range of tools to measure network performance, node health, enhanced correlation across a broad range of end points and workforce guidance on next best action creates process efficiencies that help eliminate customer facing problems.<br/><br/><strong>Increased Use of DevOps to Speed Innovation Cycles:</strong> DevOps is gaining ground across the entire communications industry as a way to accelerate product development, increase efficiency and become more responsive to changing customer and business needs. The DevOps methodology can offer the cable MSO major advantages as they take on digital transformation and address customer expectations. These include accelerated time-to-market for new services, increased flexibility and optimized cost-efficiency.<br/><br/><strong>Virtualization, Starting With vCPE/vCCAP:</strong> The move to virtualization in cable is well underway. CableLabs, in a recent Open Networking assessment, said the combined technologies will lower OpEx and CapEx and increase revenues from new services provided to consumers. MSOs also have the opportunity to leverage the newfound flexibility of virtualizing service endpoints, pushing cost at the end-point level down, and moving functionality to the cloud. Going to a virtual CCAP architecture migrates the current headend from RF to digital, allowing the MSO to provide IP centric services (video and data) from the headend to the node. This in turn removes the need for a physical CCAP/CMTS, reducing costs, complexity and still allowing for easy integration into the cable provider’s existing OSS/BSS.<br/><br/>vCPE lets the MSO place a low cost “dumb box” in the home and have all services and operations fed directly from the cloud. This translates into reduce costs for hardware, more “plug and play” functionality, fewer truck rolls to the home to replace out-of-date CPE, and the ability to push more innovative services more quickly, keeping the customers engaged and loyal.<br/><br/><strong>Winning the Retention Game</strong><br/>While each of these innovations is more or less invisible to most cable customers, the investment in each provides a tangible benefit to the customer journey and experience. The rising expectations of the customer will continue to drive innovation and created disruption across the IT landscape. Opportunities to serve the customer have never been more significant, and the biggest changes are yet to come. If innovation still has a predominant focus on customer outcome, then the cost of that innovation will ultimately be “priceless.” In today’s competitive market, that’s a cost worth investing in.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Lack of Leadership, or Distractions? ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/blog/lack-leadership-or-distractions-393379</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Lack of Leadership, or Distractions? ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">nhdSW2rnrhXXq64htH2kza</guid>
                                                                                                                            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[MCN Guest Blog]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Edward Bleier ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                        <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                <cf:isSponsored>false</cf:isSponsored>
                <cf:hasAffiliateLinks>false</cf:hasAffiliateLinks>
                <cf:isPaid>false</cf:isPaid>
                                                                                                                                                        <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>There are many ways, each with some cost to some players, to slow the inevitable decline of the MVPD “ecosystem” — which has been immensely profitable, particularly for industry leadership.</p><p>Some technological erosion is inevitable. After all, the industry itself flourished because of technological innovation.</p><p>For the past few years, though, there has been insufficient effort to stem the erosion. Following are several suggestions, ranging from practical to impractical, free to expensive. With subscribers selling for $5,000 to $6,000 a pop, it’s an investment in “retention.”</p><p>Perhaps, leadership was “distracted”: Comcast was fighting for its finally-aborted Time Warner Cable acquisition; TWC, in turn, was tied up by the strategic attention of Charter; DirecTV and AT&T finally worked out their merger; Time Warner Inc. was fending off Rupert Murdoch’s unsolicited takeover, while Rupert was passing the mantle to his kids; Viacom was focused on Sumner Redstone’s sick room rather than its MSO problems; Dish Network had strategies du jour; and The Walt Disney Co. was building multibillion-dollar cruise boats and Chinese parks while brilliantly absorbing the major movie/consumer “brands” of Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm, etc.</p><p>Who, among industry leaders, led the fight to: lower subscriber costs, advocate the “bundle,” improve the experience and — directly or indirectly — rebut the public-relations tsunami of Netflix’s Reed Hastings? Points to consider:</p><p>► Are any programmers, or distributors, willing to make less now to keep high costs from changing the system?</p><p>► Are “skinny” bundles really the solution? For anybody?</p><p>► Anachronistic equipment charges: Perhaps profitable or not fully amortized, but customers pay $10 to $40 per month for “dumb” equipment in a generation of “cool” gadgets. “TV everywhere” was a start, but which MVPD is really offering multiple-set access without high extra charges?</p><p>► High prices for programming: Sports aside, monthly fees are relatively minimal, but those programmers (Discovery, A&E, Viacom, Hallmark, Scripps, AMC, etc.) fail to “educate” the audience about how inexpensive they really are.</p><p>► Sports costs: Over many long years of knowing — and admiring — Disney chairman and CEO Bob Iger, I’ve never seen him as uncomfortable as on CNBC justifying ESPN. The full ESPN package can cost cable/ satellite subscribers more than $8 per month.</p><p>Add charges for RSNs (in New York: MSG, SNY, MSG Plus, YES, etc.) and other all sports networks (CBS Sports Network, NBCSN, Fox Sports One, Tennis Channel, MLB Network, NFL Network, Golf Channel, etc.). Add retransmission fees charged by CBS, Fox, NBC and ABC (largely for ESPN events); plus Turner’s higher cable fees.</p><p>Conceivably, subscribers to the “full bundle” are paying $30-40 monthly just for sports — which some subscribers never watch.</p><p>► Kids’ programming: Ditto, fees charged for children’s/adolescent programming (Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network, MTV, Disney, etc.). Unwatched in (many) homes without kids, it alienates many customers.</p><p>► Program sameness: The ecosystem has been highly profitable for most players, in part because of low-cost, “nonfiction/reality” programming — but also leading to a dreary sameness among 10 to 20 channels.</p><p>Has the industry made its case for the low-cost and, occasionally, high-quality enrichment value of many reality programs vs. those only exploitative?</p><p>► “Compulsory” programming: It is clear some subscribers will not live without their favorite sports teams or the NFL? Some are sworn to Fox News Channel. Some to <em>Game of Thrones</em>.</p><p>Though much of its programming is really “attractive,” how much is really “compulsory” — on A&E, Discovery, USA Network, AMC, MTV, FX, TNT, et. al.? With a plethora of reruns and children’s programming available OTT, is America’s economically-pinched middle class being encouraged to “cut the cord?” Who is leading the fight for the “good stuff ” there now?</p><p>And who is inventing programming that just “can’t be missed”? (Even <em>The Daily Show With Jon Stewart</em> was available on the Internet when Suddenlink’s systems dropped Viacom.)</p><p>► Commercials: All subscribers now have record/ playback devices, which encourages commercial skipping. Premium linear networks and new OTT program sources are generally commercial-free. So, as TV advertising thinned out and commoditized, the industry response was to jam even more commercials into programming. Is that leadership?</p><p>► Public relations, in general: In addition to Netflix’s brilliant initiatives, other deep-pocketed “digital” players (Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, et. al.) now compete with even more programming and even more, often specialized, advertising.</p><p>Have the threatened “traditional” media companies responded with sufficient marketing and public relations?</p><p>► Marketing costs: Despite all the “certainty” about OTT, there has been very little analysis of the extraordinary marketing costs required to introduce new services, skinny bundles, even individual programs or movies. Most would-be “consolidators” have not yet been market-tested.</p><p>Conversely, the added expense of retaining an MPVD subscriber seems very efficient vs. losing one worth $5,000 to $6,000.</p><p>Perhaps technological — and social — change is rapidly eroding the previously secure ecosystem. Fifty years ago, Marshall McLuhan taught that “distribution determined content.” Lazy thinkers believed the quasi-monopoly made “content king.” The day of reckoning has arrived.</p><p>But, it seems, the traditional “leadership” has given up without a real fight.</p><p><em>Edward Bleier is the retired president of Warner Bros. Domestic Pay TV, Cable & Network Features, now serving as a board member of three media companies.</em></p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
            </channel>
</rss>