<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>
    <channel>
                    <atom:link href="https://www.nexttv.com/feeds/tag/publicly-traded" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                            <title><![CDATA[ Latest from Next TV in Publicly-traded ]]></title>
                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/tag/publicly-traded</link>
        <description><![CDATA[ All the latest publicly-traded content from the Next TV team ]]></description>
                                    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 17:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                            <language>en</language>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Analyst Makes Case for Altice USA To Go Private ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/analyst-makes-case-for-altice-usa-to-go-private</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ MoffettNathanson's Craig Moffett writes that selling off Suddenlink, going private one way to unlock hidden value ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">7SbAyD8oRc4pLpmEAkqMXh</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hrYtuJMbvNn3ejaUsiQEoi-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 20:34:11 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[On The Money]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ michael.farrell@futurenet.com (Mike Farrell) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mike Farrell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/W74hEd5BFbwpWEgrytvFyP.jpg ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hrYtuJMbvNn3ejaUsiQEoi-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[Altice USA]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                        <media:description><![CDATA[Altice USA building in Long Island City, N.Y. ]]></media:description>                                                            <media:text><![CDATA[Altice USA building]]></media:text>
                                <media:title type="plain"><![CDATA[Altice USA building]]></media:title>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hrYtuJMbvNn3ejaUsiQEoi-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>Influential media analyst <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/tag/craig-moffett">Craig Moffett</a> took a deep dive into <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/tag/altice-usa">Altice USA</a> Wednesday, issuing a 39-page report that says with broadband growth behind its peers and doubts that its rural markets can take up the slack, one way to unlock its value would be to take the company private. </p><p>Altice USA stock has been battered over the past few months, dropping more than 20% since July 28 <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/analysts-brace-for-broadband-slowdown">when it released Q2 results</a> that showed zero broadband subscriber growth at a time when its larger peers are watching their high-speed data rolls rise. In his report, Moffett, principal and senior analyst at MoffettNathanson, noted that despite that sluggish performance, Altice USA’s sum-of-the-parts valuation indicates that Wall Street perhaps has the cable company all wrong. </p><p>While Moffett admitted that Altice USA has a “broadband pricing problem,” that there is some doubt that efforts to boost broadband customers in its more rural Suddenlink footprint will offset subscriber declines in its more metropolitan Optimum footprint, even conservative valuations of its four major geographies indicate a much higher value for the company than Wall Street has assigned. </p><p>“There’s a price for everything … and, to put it bluntly, this ain’t it,” Moffett wrote. “Altice’s current valuation is simply too cheap, and by a huge margin.”</p><p>The notion of going private at latest appeared to be attractive to some investors. Altice USA shares were up nearly 4% ($1.05 each) in early trading Sept. 8 to $28.19 per share. The stock was priced at $27.94 at 12:57 p.m. Wednesday, up 3% or 81 cents each.</p><p>Given the <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/analyst-astound-sale-points-to-strong-cable-valuations">high valuations for recent private cable deals</a>, including Altice’s own  purchase of <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/altice-usa-completes-small-system-buy ">Service Electric Cable of NJ</a>  (10 times consensus cash flow) and its <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/altice-usa-to-buy-morris-broadband-for-dollar310-million">March  agreement to buy North Carolina broadband provider Morris Broadband</a> (24 times), Moffett assigned an 11.7 times multiple to Suddenlink, a 10.1x  multiple to legacy Optimum systems and a 14.6 times multiple to its Lightpath division, pushing the combined company’s estimated trading multiple to 10.8 times forward looking cash flow. At that multiple, Moffett estimated that Altice USA stock should be priced at $51 per share, nearly double its Sept. 7 close of $27.25 each. </p><p>Moffett added that to take Altice USA private, the company would have to pay a premium to its current stock price, but at $30, $35, $40 or even $45 per share, that option would appear to be a bargain.</p><p>Going private is nothing new for cable operators, and usually is driven by the perception that the public market is severely undervaluing assets. <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/mediacom-public-no-more-327901">Mediacom Communications</a> was the last major publicly traded cable operator to go private in 2011, and has had <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/mediacom-20-years-growth-403267">tremendous success </a>as a private company. In 2004, <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/cox-accepts-parent-s-buyout-offer-337575 ">Cox Communications went private</a> in a deal valued at $8.5 billion, and hasn’t looked back since. </p><p>The analyst added that in one scenario, Altice USA could sell off its Suddenlink division at an 11.7 times multiple (implying a selling price of $22.7 billion) and Lightpath for 14.6 times cash flow (implying a $1.57 billion sale price), while retaining the Optimum business by purchasing the remaining public float. Moffett estimated that at a $35 per share take out price and the sale of Suddenlink and Lightpath, Altice USA could take itself private — debt free — for about $7.9 billion. At $45 per share, the total cost would rise to $10.3 billion.</p><p>Moffett stressed that going private is not something he is suggesting that Altice USA will do, but is something they could do. And there are also several possible iterations of the going private option, he wrote.</p><p>“The takeaway here is that, even with a meaningful premium, the current valuation is so  cheap that it creates enormous optionality,” Moffett wrote, adding that Altice USA has been doing its own “modified take-private” for years.</p><p>Moffett noted that since <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/altice-usa-completes-separation-european-parent">separating from Altice N.V. in 2018</a>, Altice USA has made about $7.7 billion in share repurchases, reducing its total shares outstanding by about 38%. Excluding the ownership stake held by Altice N.V. chairman Patrick Drahi, and Altice USA has reduced  its public float by more than half.   </p><p>“Indeed, it may be the case that Drahi would conclude that it is more attractive to simply stay the course and retire shares until the remaining float is so small that almost any premium paid to complete the job would be financially immaterial,” Moffett wrote. He estimated that Altice USA, if it maintains its leverage target of 4.5 times to 5 times cash flow, would buy back about $8.5 billion of its stock through 2025.</p><p>“Altice could go private, sell select assets — we highlighted Suddenlink just because we suspect it would be so easy to sell — and own what&apos;s left for... well, for nothing at all,” Moffett continued. </p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Graham Holdings to Spin Off Cable One ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/graham-holdings-spin-cable-one-385555</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Graham Holdings to Spin Off Cable One ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">4sJ5ByRR5vGyuhFJTBRQvD</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qx7T6u2rHu8FySictoo4A5-1280-80.png" type="image/png" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mike Farrell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <media:content type="image/png" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qx7T6u2rHu8FySictoo4A5-1280-80.png">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qx7T6u2rHu8FySictoo4A5-1280-80.png" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="qx7T6u2rHu8FySictoo4A5" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qx7T6u2rHu8FySictoo4A5.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/qx7T6u2rHu8FySictoo4A5.png" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p>Graham Holdings said that its board of directors has authorized management to proceed with   plans to spin off its Cable One cable assets, a deal that could be completed next year.</p><p>Cable One, which has about 476,233 video customers in 19 states, is currently embroiled in a carriage battle with Viacom, whose networks have been <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/viacom-channels-cable-one-nctc-pact-expires-373503" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/viacom-channels-cable-one-nctc-pact-expires-373503">dark to the operator’s customers for about seven months.</a>  The operator, which has seen its video subscriber rolls dip 15% since Q3 2013, has said it is <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/subs-decline-cable-one-begins-downplaying-video-385222" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/subs-decline-cable-one-begins-downplaying-video-385222">downplaying video in favor of broadband service</a>. </p><p>Graham Holdings stocks soared on the news – shares rose as much as 11.7% ($92.76 each) to $886.05 per share in early trading Nov. 14.</p><p> “After a careful review of strategic options, we believe that a separation of Graham Holdings and Cable One will create value for the companies and our shareholders,” said Graham Holdings chairman Donald Graham in a statement. “The separation will position Graham Holdings to pursue continued growth opportunities, while enabling Cable One to focus entirely on its video, Internet and voice services and to attract a more natural stockholder base.”</p><p>The proposed transaction will be structured as a tax-free spin-off of Cable One to the stockholders of Graham Holdings. The transaction is contingent on the satisfaction of a number of conditions, including completion of the review process by the Securities and Exchange Commission of required filings under applicable securities regulations, other applicable regulatory approvals and the final approval of transaction terms by the board of directors of Graham Holdings.</p><p>In a research note, Nomura Securities analyst Adam Ilkowitz wrote that the spin could be a another step in the rationalization of the Graham family’s media holdings – they sold the Washington Post to Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos for $250 million in 2013 – but also could make it easier for the cable operator to participate in industry consolidation.</p><p>“Cable One is a smaller, rural-focused cable operator that has recently struggled with programming costs and may benefit from an increase in scale,” Ilkowitz wrote.</p><p>The analyst placed a $2 billion to $2.5 billion enterprise value on Cable One, based on a 6.5 times to 8.25 times cash flow multiple. Cable One reported 2013 cash flow of about $302 million. 2013 cash flow margins of 37.4% were similar to larger operators, he wrote.  </p><p>Ilkowitz noted that Cable One’s decision to emphasize data over video could lead to further margin expansion, “though growth may prove tough.”</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
            </channel>
</rss>