<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>
    <channel>
                    <atom:link href="https://www.nexttv.com/feeds/tag/personal-information" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                            <title><![CDATA[ Latest from Next TV in Personal-information ]]></title>
                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/tag/personal-information</link>
        <description><![CDATA[ All the latest personal-information content from the Next TV team ]]></description>
                                    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                            <language>en</language>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ New Bill Would Ban 'Surveillance' Ads ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/new-bill-would-ban-surveillance-ads</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Dems say it combats pernicious practice that fuels host of ills ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">BTJkp2i9gXiH2fXr9YSGEc</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Wm3oC6ExCgJfBmdWHsPRTR-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 01:10:59 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ john.eggerton@futurenet.com (John Eggerton) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ John Eggerton ]]></dc:creator>                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ETjt8sjZcQr97v7yakQ4hP.jpg ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Wm3oC6ExCgJfBmdWHsPRTR-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[Architect of the Capitol]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <media:description><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></media:description>                                                            <media:text><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></media:text>
                                <media:title type="plain"><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></media:title>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Wm3oC6ExCgJfBmdWHsPRTR-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>A trio of Democratic legislators has introduced a bill that would ban the use of personal information to target most online <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/tag/advertising">advertising</a>.</p><p>The bill defines that personal information broadly, saying it comprises "data linked or reasonably linkable to an individual or connected device, including inferred and derived data, contents of communications, internet browsing history, and advertising identifiers."</p><p>The <a href="https://eshoo.house.gov/sites/eshoo.house.gov/files/BanningSurveillanceAdsAct_Section-by-Section.pdf">Banning Surveillance Advertising Act</a> was introduced Tuesday (January 18) by Reps. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.).</p><p><a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/ftc-ponders-rules-on-data-privacy-security-algorithms">Also: FTC Ponders Rules on Data Privacy</a></p><p>The bill prohibits advertisers or third parties from using personal data for most targeted advertising, the exceptions being ones that use broad location targeting to, say, a specific city.</p><p>The bill would prevent any targeting of ads based on race, gender, religion or any personal data purchased from data brokers.</p><p>It would not prohibit so-called "contextual advertising," which are ads relevant to content a user is engaging with.</p><p>Eshoo said the bill was aimed at the "unseemly collection and hoarding of personal data" for targeting ads, calling it a pernicious practice that fuels disinformation, voter suppression, discrimination and more.</p><p>"With the introduction of the Ban Surveillance Advertising Act, advertisers will be forced to stop exploiting individuals’ online behavior for profits and our communities will be safer as a result," said Booker. </p><p>"ANA strongly disagrees with the new bills introduced by Congresswoman Eshoo and Senator Booker that would unreasonably restrain American businesses from using responsible, data-driven advertising to connect with consumers," said the Association of National Advertisers&apos; government affairs office in a statement. "Study after study – as well as consumers’ own statements and responses to ads – show that data-driven advertising yields significant benefits for consumers, businesses and the US economy in general.  Access to information provided by such advertising helps consumers to make informed choices among products and services; consumers understand, desire and value relevant ads.  Data-driven advertising enables businesses to engage more efficiently with their customers and contributes significantly to the overall US GDP.  Furthermore, data-driven advertising supports free and low-cost online content and services and allows the Internet to remain open and accessible to all.  The bills would eliminate these benefits.  We also have great concerns about the constitutionality of the bills, as they appear to encroach on First Amendment free speech protections, and the private right of action lawsuit provision in the bills could lead to excessive and costly litigation.</p><p>"The sponsors base their bills on the fact that consumers don’t have a choice about these ads; but they do.  Consumers have various means by which they can control interest-based advertising, including opting out of the practice if they wish. ANA will continue its efforts to promote advertising that is helpful to consumers and businesses alike.  Rather than pursuing this flawed legislation, we urge Members of Congress to focus on passing a national privacy law to eliminate the inconsistent and burdensome requirements being adopted by states that leave consumers with varying degrees of protection depending upon where they live, and that pose great financial costs on businesses." </p><p>■</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Pew Survey: Majority Favor More Online Ad Regs ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/pew-survey-majority-favor-more-online-ad-regs-385485</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Pew Survey: Majority Favor More Online Ad Regs ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">hePWHjgYYg4EXcdsrNxNtU</guid>
                                                                                                                            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ john.eggerton@futurenet.com (John Eggerton) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ John Eggerton ]]></dc:creator>                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/ETjt8sjZcQr97v7yakQ4hP.jpg ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>A majority of respondents (64%) in a January 2014 survey say they believe the government should "do more" to regulate advertisers' use of customers' personal information, but more than half (55%) also say they are willing to share "some information" with companies in exchange for getting online services for free.</p><p>The respondents don't seem particularly concerned about information collection on their buying habits or media use. Those ranked last and second to last, respectively, on their rankings of information, with only 8% calling buying habits that very sensitive information and 9% saying that about what media they like.</p><p>Those are some of the takeaways from a just-released Pew Research Center survey, the first from a panel assembled to gauge the impact of the Edward Snowden leaks about government surveillance programs.</p><p>Eight out of 10 adults 18 and older believe that Americans should be concerned about government monitoring of Internet and phone communications, while even more, 91%, say consumers have lost control over how companies collect and use their personal information and most don't feel very secure sharing information on social media sites.</p><p>Only a little over a third of the respondents said they agreed or strongly agreed with the statement "It is a good thing for society if people believe that someone is keeping an eye on the things that they do online."</p><p>Another eight out of 10 (81%) say the don't feel very secure or at all secure sharing private information with a trusted person or organization using a social media site.</p><p>In addition, 68% say they feel insecure using chat or instant messaging. For text messaging, the percentage is 58%, 57%  for e-mail, 46% for cell phone calls, and 31% for landline calls.</p><p>There was not much of a difference by age, says senior researcher Mary Madden. "In general, I’d say the fact that there are relatively few consistent differences by age is notable," she said. "For example, given the common stereotype that young adults don’t care at all about their privacy, it’s interesting to see that they are just as likely as older adults to say that they “would like to do more” to protect the privacy of their personal information online.</p><p>"In addition, there are places where young adults are more likely than seniors to consider certain information to be 'very sensitive.' For instance, that’s true for the content of email (59% of 18-29 year olds see that as “very sensitive” information, compared with 42% of adults ages 65 and older) and the records of numbers called and texted from your phone (53% of 18-29 year olds see that as “very sensitive” information, compared with 36% of adults ages 65 and older)."</p><p>The report was released the same day the government's Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board held a hearing in Washington exploring the stakes involved in balancing protecting privacy with protecting a country's citizens against terrorism through surveillance and other government information gathering.</p><p>One panelist said the mosaic effect of data collection and targeting is powerful, which is the merging of one data point with other available data to infer things about a consumer. Say, inferring from the purchase of skin lotion that a woman is pregnant.</p><p>Another panelist said that strong privacy protections aren't bad for security because they make people more comfortable with necessary surveillance.</p><p>The survey is the first of a series of polls conducted with the same panel of 607 adults who have agreed to four surveys  over the course of a year. This first survey was conducted Jan. 11-28. 2014, of adults 18-plus and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.98 percentage points at a 95% level of confidence. That means if the survey were repeated multiple times, the results from 95% of those repetitions would fall within that margin of error.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
            </channel>
</rss>