<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>
    <channel>
                    <atom:link href="https://www.nexttv.com/feeds/tag/doug-mitchelson" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                            <title><![CDATA[ Latest from Next TV in Doug-mitchelson ]]></title>
                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/tag/doug-mitchelson</link>
        <description><![CDATA[ All the latest doug-mitchelson content from the Next TV team ]]></description>
                                    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                            <language>en</language>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Altice USA Shares Fall for Third Straight Trading Day ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/altice-usa-shares-fall-for-third-straight-trading-day</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Stock down nearly 6% after Credit Suisse, Raymond James analysts downgrade ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">MdYEVXMLLgzSWAMRACkgKa</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mUqpUw297WUdprmppgapdN-1280-80.gif" type="image/gif" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:12:50 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                <updated>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:44:02 +0000</updated>
                                                                                                                                            <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ michael.farrell@futurenet.com (Mike Farrell) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mike Farrell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/W74hEd5BFbwpWEgrytvFyP.jpg ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/gif" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mUqpUw297WUdprmppgapdN-1280-80.gif">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[iStock]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <media:description><![CDATA[stock quotes]]></media:description>                                                            <media:text><![CDATA[stock quotes]]></media:text>
                                <media:title type="plain"><![CDATA[stock quotes]]></media:title>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mUqpUw297WUdprmppgapdN-1280-80.gif" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>Altice USA shares fell for the third straight trading day on Monday, slipping nearly 6% after analysts at Credit Suisse and Raymond James downgraded the stock.</p><p>Altice USA shares closed Monday at $19.38 each, down 5.8% or $1.20 per share, after reaching another 52-week low of $19.21 per share earlier in the day. Altice USA shares are now down 23.3% since Sept. 23, when CEO Dexter Goei said at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia conference that <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/altice-usa-shares-fall-after-ceo-says-q3-broadband-subscriber-growth-will-be-negative ">Q3 broadband additions for the company would be negative.</a></p><p>Several analysts have <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/did-altice-usa-cut-costs-too-much">adjusted their estimates</a> on Altice USA since the Goldman conference, and on Monday, Credit Suisse analyst Doug Mitchelson wrote that he was concerned about the company, adding that he was wrong about Altice USA’s broadband competitiveness and <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/altice-usa-stock-falls-after-downgrades-2021-09-27?mod=mw_quote_news">according to reports</a> said that he expects the company’s new investment strategy to “take at least several quarters, if not longer, to begin bearing fruit.”</p><p>He lowered his rating on the shares to “neutral” from “outperform” and reduced his 12-month price target on the stock to $24 from $46 per share.</p><p>Raymond James media analyst Frank Louthan IV also noted Altice USA’s decision to move away from share repurchases -- which he saw as a key component of its valuation -- as a reason for downgrading the stock from “outperform” to “market perform” on Monday.</p><p>     . </p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Time Warner Outruns Peers in Affiliate-Fee Race ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/time-warner-outruns-peers-affiliate-fee-race-411314</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Time Warner Outruns Peers in Affiliate-Fee Race ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">3MgYDSjxCxwFbDqBxPaJGb</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AEYuGfkw2eycsiWbbqSZTc-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mike Farrell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AEYuGfkw2eycsiWbbqSZTc-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AEYuGfkw2eycsiWbbqSZTc-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="AEYuGfkw2eycsiWbbqSZTc" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AEYuGfkw2eycsiWbbqSZTc.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/AEYuGfkw2eycsiWbbqSZTc.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p>Time Warner, understandably preoccupied with its pending $108.7 billion acquisition by AT&T, still managed to lap its media company peers on the affiliate-revenue front last year and is on pace for more of the same in 2017, according to UBS media analyst Doug Mitchelson.<br/><br/>That growth, especially during a period when programmers are pressured by falling ratings, skinny bundles that lock them out of millennial-focused packages and over-the-top distribution, could be a key reason why the programmer was so attractive to AT&T in the first place.<br/><br/>AT&T has said repeatedly that content will drive the future — and Entertainment Group chief John Stankey reiterated that point at the Mobile World Congress conference in Barcelona, Spain, last week, telling the audience that programming is what will make AT&T relevant.<br/><br/>“Content that is compelling matters,” Stankey said at the conference.<br/><br/>Content that is compelling also makes money.<br/><br/><strong><em>‘TIMING WAS GOOD’<br/></em></strong>In a recent deep dive into the programming industry, Mitchelson pointed out that Time Warner’s affiliate fee growth in Q4 of 2016 was 15%, more than double that of its closest peer, 21st Century Fox, at 7.4%.<br/><br/>Affiliate-fee growth actually declined for other programmers last year, according to Mitchelson, as 2016 was marked by declining subscriber rolls as customers cut back on various distribution cords in favor of OTT services and skinnier bundles.<br/><br/>Time Warner’s Turner division in fact has seen similar declines — the company averaged about a 2% loss in subscribers last year, about the same as its peers — yet has managed to keep affiliate-fee growth humming.<br/><br/>Part of that is because Time Warner struck carriage deals in 2015 and 2016 with major distributors like AT&T and Dish Network that usually have higher increases in the early years.<br/><br/>“The timing was good,” Telsey Advisory Group media analyst Tom Eagan said. Turner had earlier issued guidance for mid-teen percentage growth for 2016, which it delivered handily, Eagan noted. He said domestic affiliate-fee growth is expected to rise another 13% to 14% at Turner in 2017, leveling off a bit to 13% growth in 2018.<br/><br/>Mitchelson doesn’t expect the affiliate train to slow down this year, either. He’s predicting a 12.9% increase in fees for Time Warner in 2017, while Fox is expected to grow by about 8.2% in the same period.<br/><br/>Credit Suisse media analyst Omar Sheikh also was encouraged by the affiliate fee increases. He expects 15% growth in 2017 followed by a 10% rise in each of the years between 2018 and 2020. At premium channel HBO, which had a 5% affiliate fee increase in 2016, Sheikh predicts fees will rise 6% in 2017-2018 and 5% in 2019-2020.<br/><br/>Helping out HBO’s bottom line has been its standalone OTT product, HBO Now. Launched in April 2015, HBO Now has about 2 million subscribers and growing.<br/><br/>“We expect growth to be driven by affiliate renewals and strength at HBO Now,” Sheikh wrote, helping to offset rising programming costs — up 7% in 2016 and estimated to rise 9% in 2017 — “and demonstrates that the company is executing well on its opportunity to grow domestic subscribers, which management has noted is HBO’s ‘most important long-term growth driver.’ ”<br/><br/>Just as in 2016, key to Turner’s future growth will be its ability to secure healthy increases with existing distributors as well as with new digital distributors. Turner seems to be out of the mix at least initially in Google’s new YouTube TV offering — the 30-channel, $35 monthly video service currently doesn’t have any Turner or Viacom networks in its lineup. That’s likely to change, Eagan said, but in order to keep the $35 price point, more expensive networks like Turner will likely be available on separate tiers or packages for an additional charge.<br/><br/><strong><em>MILESTONE MOMENTS AHEAD<br/></em></strong>On the traditional carriage front, Turner’s Comcast affiliate agreement comes due in the next few months, and the programmer is expected to be part of Hulu’s live-TV streamed offering scheduled to be release later this year. Time Warner is a part owner of Hulu, along with The Walt Disney Co., Fox and Comcast’s NBCUniversal.<br/><br/>The Hulu deal could be key for Turner. The much anticipated but scantily described offering — expected to have a $40 monthly price point — could set the tone for similar offerings in the future.<br/><br/>Turner has been an enthusiastic participant in OTT services: Its AT&T distribution pact in September was one of the first for the telco’s DirecTV Now over-the-top service, which launched in December and has about 200,000 subscribers.<br/><br/>Eagan said that while the number of bundled-streaming services — including Sony PlayStation Vue, Sling TV and more on the way — is growing, most have been launched by existing pay TV distributors. Programmer-owned Hulu could offer a new perspective.<br/><br/>Eagan said channel-driven streaming services such as CBS All Access, which has about 2 million customers, have fared better than operator-led services like Sling TV, which has about 1.1 million subscribers.<br/><br/>“The question is what is going to happen when you get all of the individual channel OTT services and the package runs together,” Eagan said.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ May Price Hike Could Rain Pain on Netflix ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/may-price-hike-could-rain-pain-netflix-404003</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ May Price Hike Could Rain Pain on Netflix ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">c1GAQH4nxbTd9xgY3QbEA2</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LcN376SFVbeyiPyh34ipzi-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Streaming]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mike Farrell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LcN376SFVbeyiPyh34ipzi-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LcN376SFVbeyiPyh34ipzi-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="LcN376SFVbeyiPyh34ipzi" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LcN376SFVbeyiPyh34ipzi.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/LcN376SFVbeyiPyh34ipzi.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p>A two-year grace period that shielded veteran Netflix subscribers from a 2014 price increase expires next month, an event some think could cause the subscription VOD pioneer to actually subtract customers during the second quarter of 2016.</p><p>The May switchover could be tricky: It’s the biggest price increase since 2011, when the company announced a rate hike for its streaming/mail-order DVD combination from $9.99 to $15.99 per month. Back them the backlash was swift — Netflix stock fell 40%, and customers called for Netflix CEO Reed Hastings to resign.</p><p>This time around, the company has been careful, buying itself time in the two-year wait for the initial outrage to wane. And analysts point out that customers intent on keeping the $7.99 price point can do so by dialing back their tier of service to the single-stream, standard- definition Basic Plan.</p><p>The pricing details: Netflix hiked the monthly fee for new customers in May 2014 to $9.99, but allowed existing customers at the time to remain at the previous $7.99 and $8.99 monthly rates for two years.</p><p>UBS media analyst Doug Mitchelson estimates about 17.8 million Netflix customers in the U.S. (37% of its total base) were at the $7.99 price point. He thinks the $2-permonth increase will be too high for between 3% and 4% of those customers, who will probably cancel service.</p><p><strong><em>‘U.S. MATURITY FEARS’</em></strong></p><p>Netflix is offering those grandfathered customers an opportunity to stay at the $7.99 rate, but they would have to downgrade service to one streaming device in standard definition, as opposed to two streaming devices in HD. While that could offset some of the cost-conscious churn, it isn’t expected to be much.</p><p>The churn from the grandfathered base amounts to about half of Netflix’s quarterly subscriber gains; in the fourth quarter it added about 1.5 million U.S. customers. Couple that with a maturing market — subscriber growth has softened in recent periods — and Netflix could be heading into its first negative streaming quarter ever.</p><p>“Investor concerns regarding the potential churn from such a large price increase are compounding the U.S. maturity fears already plaguing Netflix’s stock,” Mitchelson wrote. “Add in the fact that 2Q is the seasonally softest quarter, and some investors are even questioning whether Netflix will have its first quarter ever of declining U.S. streaming subscribers.”</p><p>In the past several quarters, Netflix has seen a steady softening of domestic subscriber additions, from 2.3 million adds in Q4 2013 to 1.5 million in Q4 2015. Most analysts who follow the company aren’t expecting the worst, but anticipate that the slower growth trend will continue.</p><p>Morgan Stanley media analyst Ben Swinburne revised his Q1 subscriber estimate downward to 1.8 million from 2.2 million after the SVOD pioneer missed his Q4 estimates.</p><p>“When you have as large of a subscriber base as Netflix, minor changes in churn can have a material effect on net subscriber additions,” Pivotal Research Group CEO and senior media & communications analyst Jeff Wlodarczak said. “I would be surprised if it goes negative even with negative 2Q seasonality, but you cannot completely rule it out. I figure they can do at least a couple hundred thousand.”</p><p>Mitchelson said in his report that the bear case for Netflix to lose subscribers in Q2 is unlikely, and he estimated the company would end the period with an increase of about 450,000 customers in the U.S.</p><p>Of the customers paying the old $7.99 monthly rate, Mitchelson estimated that 229,000 would churn off in Q2, with another 360,000 dropping the service in Q3.</p><p>Swinburne was a little less optimistic. He estimated that total additions would be about 150,000 and paid customer additions would be flat in the second quarter.</p><p>Fueling Mitchelson’s optimism is Netflix’s programming lineup. The company, the analyst wrote, has a strong original content slate with hit shows like <em>Orange Is the New Black</em>, <em>Jessica Jones</em> and <em>Daredevil</em>.</p><p>This year is expected to be especially strong — Netflix is increasing its original scripted series slate to 31 in 2016 from 16 in 2015 with shows like <em>The Crown</em>, <em>Marvel’s Luke Cage</em>, <em>Frontier</em> and <em>The Ranch</em> and has 10 feature films released or in production.</p><p>“We feel comfortable the slate supports our view for low levels of churn,” Mitchelson wrote in a report.</p><p><strong><em>GROWTH MARKET: THE WORLD</em></strong></p><p>While domestic growth is slowing, Netflix’s real opportunity is international, Mitchelson said. UBS estimates that the U.S., which represented 60% of total gross customer additions in 2014, will shrink to 38% by the end of 2016. Taking up the slack will be areas like Latin America, Europe and Australia.</p><p>Swinburne, also in a research note, figured international subscriber additions would rise to 3 million in the second quarter (from 2.4 million last year), with full-year additions at 15 million — 28% higher than the 11.75 million added in 2015 and outpacing his estimates for 4.1 million domestic additions in 2016.</p><p>Swinburne said he thinks international streaming customers will overtake their domestic counterparts in 2017, with 54.6 million subscribers (compared with 52.6 million domestically), reaching nearly 80 million customers by 2020. Domestic subscribers could reach 60 million in 2020 by his figures.</p><p>Wlodarczak added that, while international growth is important, so is stable U.S. growth, which validates Netflix’s increasing its original programming spend.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ UBS Study Unpacks the Bundle’s Value ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/ubs-study-unpacks-bundle-s-value-395757</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ UBS Study Unpacks the Bundle’s Value ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">gGRn87c9nbgFWoVn69i4zC</guid>
                                                                                                                            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Streaming]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mike Farrell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>As distributors and programmers struggle to create packages of programming that will attract the right audience at the right price point, one constant is beginning to emerge: the traditional bundle offers the best value at the best price.</p><p>UBS Securities media analyst Doug Mitchelson probably made the biggest case for preserving the traditional TV bundle last week with a comprehensive look at the value of TV networks.</p><p>In a 44-page report, Mitchelson and his team combined survey data with algorithms developed by UBS’s Evidence Lab to create a software program that uses data from the survey, average pricing data from networks and its own survey information regarding such demographic and customer satisfaction data like age, size of household, pay TV status, as subscription video-on-demand services and annual household income to determine the combination of a la carte channels that would satisfy the most consumers.</p><p>Applying those factors, the UBS software can calculate 288 quadrillion possible bundles.</p><p>The UBS analysts concluded what many others also have in the past several months —the best bundle is the one that most distributors already offer.</p><p>But viewers didn’t reach that conclusion easily. UBS surveyed 1,855 individuals in April, ranging in age from 18 to 55 and across income levels. Like many surveys of the bundle conducted over the past several months, respondents were a study in contradictions.</p><p>For example, in the UBS survey, nearly 70% of the respondents said they were definitely or probably interested in an a la carte offering; 70% of those same people said they were satisfied with the value of pay TV.</p><p>Asked to create their own a la carte packages out of an existing 60-channel expanded-basic offering, their average custom bundle cost $127 per month, or about 20% more than the cost of an average expanded-basic package.</p><p>“Overall, we believe the evidence shows that the pay TV bundle is nowhere close to a tipping point, while OTT pay TV services will be challenged to offer a low-priced service that would also be popular,” Mitchelson wrote.</p><p>The study also found that so-called cost-conscious viewers are passionate about the TV they watch, even the channels they don’t watch regularly. On average, respondents to the study said they watched 17 to 18 channels (six of which were considered “favorites”), but chose 35 channels in their “custom” packages.</p><p>On average, respondents were willing to pay $15 more per month to add channels they did not initially choose in their custom bundles.</p><p>Age, not household income, played the biggest role in the respondents’ desire for a la carte. According to UBS, about 67% of households with incomes of $55,000 per year or less were interested in a la carte, as were 69% of households with annual incomes of $55,000 to $99,000 and 71% of households with more than $100,000 in annual income.</p><p>By contrast, about 75% of respondents aged 18-34 would definitely or probably be interested in a la carte, while 62% of respondents aged 55 or older were interested.</p><p>Millennials have long been the target of over-the-top and skinny bundle services, but have been reluctant to pay for TV, instead opting to watch online video and cheaper subscription demand services. While that separation from reality appears to be evident in the UBS survey — younger respondents generally wanted more channels for less money — there seems to be some light at the end of the tunnel.</p><p>At the <em>Multichannel News</em>/<em>Broadcasting & Cable</em> Next TV Summit in San Francisco last week, Sling TV senior vice president and chief product officer Ben Weinberger said millennials begin to warm up to the idea of paying for television at the ripe old age of 23.</p><p>That, said Needham & Co. media analyst Laura Martin, is good news for pay TV providers. “That’s a hugely positive surprise,” she said.</p><p>All this leads to what Mitchelson calls the real problem for cable, satellite and telco TV operators.</p><p>“Overall, consumers clearly want more choice, but even if they were given greater packaging flexibility we believe consumers would invariably end right back where they are now, in the big pay TV bundle,” Mitchelson wrote. “This suggests the industry has a significant marketing problem more than it has a price/value issue.”</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
            </channel>
</rss>