<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>
    <channel>
                    <atom:link href="https://www.nexttv.com/feeds/tag/bazinet" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                            <title><![CDATA[ Latest from Next TV in Bazinet ]]></title>
                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/tag/bazinet</link>
        <description><![CDATA[ All the latest bazinet content from the Next TV team ]]></description>
                                    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 21:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                            <language>en</language>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ INTX 2016: Cable Nets Aren’t Dead, They’re Just Redefined  ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/intx-2016-cable-nets-aren-t-dead-they-re-just-redefined-404964</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ INTX 2016: Cable Nets Aren’t Dead, They’re Just Redefined ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">jRvv8y5X545xSRkhY3Uwom</guid>
                                                                                                                            <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Cable TV]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mike Farrell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p><a href="https://mail.nbmedia.com/owa/redir.aspx?SURL=5QpdHHKuyKMIvHWy3146cPzYk5apR4P8HGKeAHQXadzN695zz33TCGgAdAB0AHAAOgAvAC8AdwB3AHcALgBtAHUAbAB0AGkAYwBoAGEAbgBuAGUAbAAuAGMAbwBtAC8AaQBuAHQAeAA.&URL=http%253a%252f%252fwww.multichannel.com%252fintx"><strong>Get more #INTX2016 news.</strong></a></p><p>BOSTON – The rising presence of over-the-top services and skinny bundles is forcing pay TV networks to take a hard look at their business, a panel of top media analysts said at an INTX Show session here Monday.</p><p>Morgan Stanley media analyst Ben Swinburne said in the past 12-24 months there has been a dramatic shift in how content companies perceive themselves, adding they can no longer force distributors to take the full suite of their networks or nothing at all. Instead, the conversation has shifted to “how can we make this work so I can keep most of my economics,” Swinburne said.</p><p>The Morgan Stanley analyst pointed to Discovery Communications CEO David Zaslav, who in a recent earning conference call said that six of Discovery’s network account for about 70% of its earnings.</p><p>Swinburne said that is forcing programmers to make compromises, which could lead to more flexibility for MVPDs in bundling networks in more genre-specific packages.</p><p>Distributors, the other analysts on the panel noted, have managed to hold their own in the changing landscape. MoffettNathanson principal and senior analyst Craig Moffett said operators still are in a good spot, with one caveat.</p><p>“Real regulation has suddenly become much more pressing,” Moffett said.</p><p>Wells Fargo media analyst Marci Ryvicker also was a distribution bull, noting that programmers, especially sports programmers, are in a difficult spot, with high content costs and the fear of not being included in skinny bundles.</p><p>“I would choose cable over media any day,” Ryvicker said.</p><p>Moffett added that fears that programmers would go direct to consumer and leave the operator in the lurch don’t make sense from either side. Moffett argued that even if a programmer were to drastically reduce prices and maintain its current profit margin, the industry’s practice of raising prices 10% or more every year could be a problem.</p><p>“Are they going to be a Netflix that raises its prices every three years?” Moffett asked. “These things sound good as long as you don’t poke at it.”</p><p>Citigroup media analyst Jason Bazinet said the direct to consumer model works because other costs are taken out of the mix.</p><p>“I don’t think it’ a challenge,” Bazinet said.</p><p>Still, Moffett said the current model is too lucrative for programmers to totally destroy.</p><p>“Find me another model that is better than ESPN, where I can get $7 [a month] for every family in America who chooses not to take my product,” Moffett said.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ Viacom Slide Softens ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.nexttv.com/news/viacom-slide-softens-386973</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ Viacom Slide Softens ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">nhL9xgSFxBrk4TTENKvtQS</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/a5q3e7bFwZ5753uLCd3KXX-1280-80.png" type="image/png" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Mike Farrell ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <media:content type="image/png" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/a5q3e7bFwZ5753uLCd3KXX-1280-80.png">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/a5q3e7bFwZ5753uLCd3KXX-1280-80.png" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="a5q3e7bFwZ5753uLCd3KXX" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/a5q3e7bFwZ5753uLCd3KXX.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/a5q3e7bFwZ5753uLCd3KXX.png" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p>Viacom shares continued to dip Thursday, the second full day after Citigroup media analyst Jason Bazinet downgraded the stock to “sell,” but the drop was less dramatic than in earlier trading.</p><p>Viacom shares closed the day down 2% ($1.32 per share), finishing at $66.48 each. It was an improvement over the 7% drop the stock endured Jan. 14 – Falling $4.83 per share to $67.80 each – after Bazinet said he expected the company could be dropped by Dish Network in its next round of carriage negotiations.</p><p>Bazinet said he didn’t know when that would happen – he guessed sometime this year – but said there was at least a 50% chance it would come true. He drew on other distributors that have dropped the troubled youth-oriented channels – like Cable One and Suddenlink Communications – which so far have been able to navigate the darkness with manageable subscriber losses.</p><p>If Dish does decide to drop the channels, it would be the latest and largest blow to the home of MTV and Comedy Central in what has been an increasingly pugilistic past 12 months. In April, Viacom channels <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/viacom-channels-cable-one-nctc-pact-expires-373503" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/viacom-channels-cable-one-nctc-pact-expires-373503">went dark to Phoenix-based Cable One</a>, leaving its 500,000 video subscribers without access to youth-oriented programming like <em>Teen Mom</em>, <em>The Daily Show</em> and <em>SpongeBob Square Pants</em>.  In October, the Viacom networks went dark to Suddenlink Communications' 1.1 million customers.</p><p>Dish, with 14 million subscribers, would be the largest distributor to decide not to carry Viacom. While neither side would comment on carriage negotiations, someone familiar with the process said that Viacom’s Dish deal doesn’t expire for at least another year.</p><p>Dish has not been shy about allowing networks to go dark – <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/turner-nets-dark-dish-384919" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/turner-nets-dark-dish-384919">eight Turner networks (including CNN, Adult Swim and Cartoon Network) were lost to the satellite company’s customers</a> for about a month last year before an extension was worked out to get them back on the air through March. The two have since reached a long-term deal for the channels.</p><p>Other spats include a <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/kicking-dish-pants-155323" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/kicking-dish-pants-155323">46-hour blackout of Viacom channels in 2004</a>, AMC Networks’ nearly four months of zombie-free darkness in 2012 and others.  </p><p>Dish was also locked in a blackout of Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network, but the nearly four-week standoff that has resulted so far in the <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/carry-dish-has-lost-90000-subs-fox-news-disconnect-386701" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/carry-dish-has-lost-90000-subs-fox-news-disconnect-386701">loss of 90,000 Dish customers</a>, according to Fox officials, was <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/dish-fox-news-reach-new-deal-386974" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/dish-fox-news-reach-new-deal-386974">resolved Thursday</a>.</p><p>While Dish could be using a potential blackout as a negotiating tactic – much like most cable networks do with distributors – it seems that the Viacom networks would be an important part of the lineup for Dish’s new over-the-top service, dubbed Sling TV. Viacom channels were conspicuously absent from the 12 channels that will initially be part of Sling TV’s introductory $20 per month package.</p><p>It should be noted that while Viacom appears to be a popular whipping boy when it comes to carriage negotiations, it secured several deals over the past 12 months representing about 25% of its subscriber base, including agreements with Time Warner Cable and Verizon Communications. During its fiscal fourth quarter conference call with analysts in November, Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman said that the programmer had about 70% of its subscribers were covered by deals that won’t expire for the next three to eight years.</p><p>Bazinet also warned that losing Dish could force Viacom into seeking out a deal -- perhaps recombining with its former corporate partner CBS – to secure carriage. In Bazinet’s thinking, distributors would be hard pressed to darken Viacom’s networks if it also meant dropping the CBS broadcast network.</p><p>Being acquired by another programmer is also an option, albeit less likely because of the size of a potential deal and Viacom’s own ratings pressures. Bazinet said that a possible suitor could be Discovery Communications, but set the odds of a deal happening at about 10%.</p><p>While losing out on Dish’s 14 million subscribers would cut into Viacom’s bottom line – Bazinet estimates it would result in a loss of $704 million in ad revenue and affiliate fees for the programmer – subscriber losses could go both ways. While Cable One said its subscriber losses leveled off after the initial shock of losing Viacom channels wore off, its markets are largely rural, largely conservative and largely older. There’s no telling whether Dish’s subscriber base – a mix of rural and more urban markets nationwide – would react the same way.   </p><p>Some have speculated that Dish could be putting forth the idea of dropping the channels to force Viacom to sign on to Sling TV – Viacom already has done deals for <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/sony-take-viacom-over-top-383701" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/sony-take-viacom-over-top-383701">Sony’s PlayStation Vue OTT service</a> – it seems a little odd that it would start this fight a year before it had to. Every carriage deal Dish has done so far for Sling TV was done in the normal negotiating cycle, including Turner, Disney, Scripps and A+E Networks. A+E Networks did not make it to the initial lineup of 12 channels, but is expected to show up in later iterations of the product.</p><p>“It’s hard to get a deal done outside of a deal cycle,” said one industry executive familiar with the matter.</p><p>It also seems odd that Dish would pick a fight with Viacom even as it uses the company’s programming as a marketing tool to lure Cable One and Suddenlink customers to Dish. Dish resellers have regularly used character images from Viacom shows – SpongeBob is particularly popular – in <a href="https://www.nexttv.com/news/distributor-dilemma-pay-more-or-lose-subs-385055" data-original-url="https://www.multichannel.com/news/distributor-dilemma-pay-more-or-lose-subs-385055">marketing to attract former cable customers</a> to the fold.</p><p>Still, stranger things have happened in the world of carriage negotiations. Only time will tell if this gets added to the list.  </p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
            </channel>
</rss>